CommunityDispatch.com
Community News and Information

Contact Us | Submit News |About Us| Subscribe | Home Page
Custom Search


search
For Home Page, Click Here

Search








Announcements
RSS Feed RSS Feed
Last Updated: Oct 20, 2009 - 6:22:46 AM

                                                                                                                              

Sexual Harassment: Private Prison Settles Retaliation Claims for Women


By EEOC


Oct 20, 2009 - 6:15:12 AM













Private Prison Pays $1.3 Million To Settle Sexual Harassment, Retaliation Claims For Class Of Women The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission


PRESS RELEASE
10-13-09

PRIVATE PRISON PAYS $1.3 MILLION TO SETTLE SEXUAL HARASSMENT, RETALIATION CLAIMS FOR CLASS OF WOMEN

EEOC Says Male Managers Demanded Sexual Favors From Female Subordinates

DENVER – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today announced the settlement of a pattern or practice discrimination lawsuit against Dominion Correctional Services, LLC and Corrections Corporation of America, both doing business as Crowley County Correctional Facility, for $1.3 million and significant remedial relief on behalf of 21 female former workers who were allegedly subjected to a sex-based hostile work environment and retaliation at an all-male, privately run medium security prison in Olney Springs, Colo.

In its lawsuit ( EEOC v. Dominion Correctional Services, LLC and Corrections Corporation Of America, Civ. No. 1:06-cv-01956-KVH), filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, the EEOC charged that female employees at the prison were subjected to unwelcome sexual harassment that included male managers forcing them to perform sex acts in order to keep their jobs. Two chiefs of security, who reported directly to the warden and to whom all security personnel at the prison reported, were allowed to resign after numerous complaints of sexual harassment and rape, according to the EEOC. In the settlement, the defendants did not admit liability.

“We at the EEOC see an unfortunately high number of sexual harassment cases, but what allegedly happened here was shocking,” said EEOC Acting Chairman Stuart J. Ishimaru. “No working woman should ever have to endure harassment and requests for sexual favors by managers in order to earn a paycheck – or suffer retaliation for complaining about the illegal harassment.”

Among the allegations in the court record are the following: A female officer made a complaint of sexual harassment against a male coworker, and was then placed in an isolated location, where she was raped by the man about whom she had complained. The Chief of Security forced a female corrections officer to have intercourse with him, which she did in order to keep her job. After that Chief of Security resigned, his replacement was the subject of numerous written complaints of sexual harassment, including complaints that he regularly commented on female employee’s bodies, and touched female officers inappropriately.

Other male managers similarly expected their female subordinates to provide sexual favors, the EEOC says in the suit. For example, a female corrections officer was coerced first into performing oral sex, and later intercourse, with a male captain, for fear of losing her job. Another female officer testified that a male lieutenant regularly made comments to her about how she looked and commented that he could do a lot better than her husband. He then allegedly told her that if she wanted to keep her job she needed to sleep with him. She resigned.

In addition to these allegations, the female employees testified that the male employees openly viewed pornography in the workplace on a regular basis, made demeaning sexual comments about the female employees, and regularly told sexual jokes.

The lawsuit further alleges that female employees who complained about the sexually hostile workplace were retaliated against. The retaliation included ostracizing the women after their complaints were publicized, scrutinizing their work, accusing them of misconduct, and assigning them to the worst and most dangerous work assignments at the prison.

EEOC Regional Attorney Mary Jo O’Neill of the Phoenix District, which includes Colorado, said, “The conduct alleged here is reprehensible. In a profession already fraught with the danger of dealing with prison inmates, it is inexcusable that another layer of fear was imposed by the men to whom these women reported and with whom they worked. The EEOC treats this type of violation with the utmost urgency and will act vigorously to uphold the laws prohibiting sexual harassment and retaliation.”

EEOC Acting District Director Rayford Irvin of the Phoenix District Office, added, “This case illustrates the continuing struggle women face in jobs traditionally held by men. The misuse of management power is especially troubling and will not be tolerated by the EEOC.”

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.


 



Announcements
Latest Headlines


With Love from a Post Office Near You
Toyota Recalls Certain Model Year Vehicles due to Pedal Accelerator Problems
Healthy Travel This Winter
California DMV extends advance Appointment Calendar to 45 Days
Haiti Earthquake: Magnitude 7.0 - HAITI REGION
IRS 2009 Tax Law Changes Provide Saving Opportunities for Nearly Everyone
Hedge Fund Fraud Father and Son Team Charged
2010; Avoid the Five Biggest Insurance Mistakes

hostile work environment, harassment in the workplace, workplace harassment